Wood floor back to the US market
| wangkiky 2 | ||
|
Reporters learned from the Municipal Bureau of Commerce, October 12, the US Department of Commerce me multilayered wood flooring anti-dumping and countervailing final ruling published case reports, the city enterprises involved to get good results again. It is reported that, in the case of anti-dumping ruling, Ronson wood and other companies involved in responding to an average tax rate of 3.31%, the country's highest tax rate of 58.84%. how to build a wood handrail for concrete steps The city was evacuated in two mandatory respondent companies - Zhejiang Yuhua Wood Co., Ltd. to obtain a zero tax rate, Zhejiang good friend Wood Co. to obtain a low rate of 3.98%. The Company obtained a zero tax rate or a lower rate, which means that they will succeed to keep the US market. November 10, 2010, the US Department of Commerce issued a notice, decided to levy anti-dumping and anti-subsidy investigations in China's multi-layer wooden floor.difference in polywood and recycled plastic According to the US Department of Commerce statistics, the United States in recent years, the number of wood imports from China increased year by year. From 2007 to 2009, the United States since the total amount of wood flooring Chinese imports increased by 76%. US flooring company believes that China exports to the United States multi-layer wooden floor underpriced, contrary to the principle of fair competition. According to customs statistics,examples of bungalows with exterior wood cladding the city in 2009 to US $ 36.94 million exports of the product concerned, involving 24 enterprises. Menacing face investigation, the city enterprises involved prompt decision to fight in the end. Meanwhile, the China Forestry Industry Association is also in the name of the Association, laminated staircase treads in bloemfontein the International Trade Commission made no prejudice to the defense. Municipal Commerce Bureau of Fair Trade Department official Zhang Feng said that this respondent for success is the result of government, business, legal team collaboration of the parties, which also shows the face of anti-dumping investigations once again, only the respondent is the way out. |
||
